Rep. Dan Crenshaw speaks throughout a information convention on December 2, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Name, Inc./Getty Pictures)

In an interview with CNN’s Dana Bash on State of the Union, Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, rejected a number of proposals for gun reform, together with background checks, crimson flag legal guidelines, and modifications to age restrictions, earlier than advocating for extra protections. in colleges.

Whereas Crenshaw acknowledged that updates to the background test legislation may very well be useful, he mentioned he nonetheless doesn’t assist common background checks.

“It might be one thing we are able to agree on is enhancing our background test system, as a result of look, once more, he went via a background test. So the issue is not {that a} crimson flag. The legislation can clear up this, it’s unclear whether or not this might have occurred,” Crenshaw mentioned. “The issue is that the background test did not seize the total story of this individual.”

Crenshaw argued that common background checks could be unrealistic.

“Individuals have to grasp that what common background checks imply, meaning I can not promote a gun to my good friend,” he mentioned, “the people who find themselves least more likely to adhere to common background checks are criminals. who trigger hurt, so once more, it is a consequence of the issue.”

Crenshaw mentioned crimson flag laws must be as much as the states, however he wouldn’t assist it in Texas. “What you are basically attempting to do with a crimson flag legislation is to implement the legislation earlier than it is damaged. And that is a extremely troublesome factor to do, it is onerous to evaluate whether or not there is a menace,” They mentioned. “Now in the event that they’re such a menace that they are already threatening somebody with a weapon, they’ve already damaged the legislation. So why do you want this second legislation?”

He argued that altering the gun shopping for age restrict to 21 would result in a slippery slope. “You understand, what occurs after we see a 22-year-old commit a torture? Are we going to boost it once more? And are we going to boost it once more? And at a sure level we now have to ourselves. The place is the limiting precept.”

The one proposal he appeared open to had had nothing to do with proscribing entry to weapons. “I feel the issues that want to alter are these issues that can have essentially the most instant and temporary affect, or tangible impact, on this stuff. And that is the true security in a faculty,” he mentioned.

Pressed by Bash whether or not security and gun reform are mutually unique to them, Crenshaw mentioned that extra gun management “most likely will not be the consequence you are in search of,” and “would infringe on the rights of tens of millions, whereas further protections”. fairly simple to bear”.

Nevertheless, he admitted in an earlier interview that legislation enforcement on the scene didn’t observe protocol and assisted the scholars. “Now, I do know finest to not essentially choose somebody who’s strolling via the breach, and in that second, is within the subject. Nevertheless it appears clear that protocol was not adopted.” “

“It’s important to overcome your sense of self-preservation and undergo that door. The coaching clearly states which you can be shot, however the individual behind you need to be capable of attempt to save harmless individuals Perhaps. It’s important to put them in entrance of you. . Do not suppose that occurred right here.”



Supply hyperlink